New Security Policies Could Reduce Tension Between Students and Staff
September 24, 2013
I have been happy to see that this year the security staff at South seems to be focusing more on safety concerns, over trivial concerns such as dress code violations. Although our security staff has always strived to keep students safe, in past years it seemed their interactions with students centered around what could be called secondary concerns – in particular, violations of the dress code. Changes that have gone into effect this year point to a greater focus on safety and a marked shift away from these practices.
This year, the security staff has new, stricter policies regarding late arrival and being in the hall without a pass. I think the new policies will create a clearer relationship between staff and students, leaving less room for arguments and hostility over unclear expectations. The prioritization of safety and security also puts students and staff on the same side, although it may take time for everyone’s perceptions to shift to reflect this. Overall, I think that this shift in priorities has the potential to be really good for the community.
There is more security presence in the hall this year, but staff are more likely to ask for a pass than tell a student that their skirt is too short or their pants are too low. Students arriving late are now required to stand in a line to scan in. Although interruptions for passes and for waiting in line seem like annoying impositions, it is clear to me that they support student safety and education.
Clearly, the security staff is our ally in this regard; students come to school to learn, and would like to be safe as they do so. This is a change from last year, when students were often singled out for discipline due to what they were wearing, or language use, among other reasons. These interactions created more confrontation between the security staff and students who were not necessarily impeding others’ safety or learning. These policies made the atmosphere of the building more hostile because students felt they could be taken aside at any moment for reasons that they did not see as significant. Members of the student body saw themselves as opposed to the security staff and administration.With the changes, I think that it is more clear what is expected of us. We understand the concerns of the security staff, and why these precautions are important.
The declaration of independence says that the government derives its power “from the the consent of the governed.” The South High security team has taken one step closer to this status this year. Their new relationship with us has the potential to reduce student friction with authority within South. This could lead to more cooperation and a better environment for the entire South community.
Edited to add: I have realized over the past few weeks that the potential benefits of the new policies that I wrote about above have not been realized. In fact, the atmosphere at South seems more hostile due to the security staff’s harsh treatment of students. Look for more in our November print issue.
Grace • Oct 2, 2013 at 12:32 pm
Carson – Sadly, I have to agree with many of the points you make in your comment about South’s atmosphere. While I was hopeful about the new policies, I think that their potential benefits have not been realized.
The more explicit rules could be used to create a clearer and more cooperative relationship, but they are being enforced so harshly that they actually create more hostility. I also hoped that the lack of dress code focus would lead to more equal treatment, with less disciplinary focus on girls. However, there are definite issues with the way that the dress code is currently enforced, as you pointed out. I don’t understand some of the things that have come under scrutiny, such as headbands. The overbearing policy makes disciplinary action seem more arbitrary, such as with people with plastic headbands being reprimanded without a clear reason under the headwear policy.
Overall, while I believe that the written polices have changed for the better, the way they are being enforced is having a negative effect on the school. I agree with you, South has become more unpleasant.
I sincerely hope that the attitude of the security staff will change and we will have a more positive atmosphere as the year goes on.
As your Hugo quote implies, I think one of the most important things in this situation is for the student voice to be heard.
Thanks for commenting! Your perspective was definitely valuable as I re-examined this topic.
Carson Backhus • Sep 25, 2013 at 10:00 pm
What you describe to be happening is not at all what I am seeing. You say that the more clearly defined relationship between students and staff reduces hostility when really it creates a tyrannical atmosphere in which the students are belittled and disempowered. I personally have become more hostile towards the security staff this year than I ever have been in the last three due to the fact that they manage to treat me like a five year old and a prisoner at the same time.
I also disagree with your opinion on the less-stressed dress code. I was happy when I first read the revised dress code stated in the August 2013 Tiger Rag because it did not include a ban on short shorts. However there seems to be a dress code that the students weren’t given because we are still getting disciplined for wearing them. Not only that, but now it’s forbidden to wear headbands? As much as I disagree with it, I understand the regulation of bandanas. But skinny plastic headbands? I didn’t realize that there was a gang of headband-wearing girls on the loose. Because that must be the reason they’re banned. If distraction is the reason cited then they might as well go after necklaces, earrings, hair ties, loose threads, and pen caps as well. There are dozens of examples that I could give on ridiculous dress code citations, but I’ll leave those alone for now.
In my opinion, the security staff members have let the power go to their heads. I can’t reasonably complain about their asking for passes in the hallways because there are clearly stated rules in accordance, but there is a line. I have an open third hour and stood in the commons today, cringing as piercing cries of “Go to class!” literally rang through the halls. What happened to physically walking to individual groups and softly yet assertively directing them to get to where they need to be? I was then asked for a pass *again* (it won’t let me italicize) and chastised me *for leaning on a table.*
The security staff make South an unpleasant place to be and I cannot wait to leave for college. But before I do, I think something has to be done to right this situation.
To conclude, you quote the Declaration of Independence so I’ll throw out some Hugo: “No one could be seen to speak in this throng, and yet there arose from it a dull, deep murmur.”